Incongruence between thought and action
Keywords:
hought; action; behavior; neuroscience; purposeAbstract
ABSTRACT
The essay reflects on the distance between thought and action, arguing that excessive reflection and comfort lead to stagnation and psychological distress.
References
Referências
Damasio, A. (2010). O erro de Descartes: Emoção, razão e o cérebro humano. Companhia das Letras.
Goleman, D. (2011). Inteligência emocional: A teoria revolucionária que redefine o que é ser inteligente. Objetiva.
Kahneman, D. (2012). Rápido e devagar: Duas formas de pensar. Objetiva.
Nietzsche, F. (2008). Assim falou Zaratustra. Companhia das Letras.
Bauman, Z. (2007). Vida líquida. Zahar.
Published
Data Availability Statement
Declaro que este manuscrito é inédito, não foi submetido a outra revista e respeita princípios éticos de pesquisa e publicação científica.
Issue
Section
Categories
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms
All articles published in Interapia – Journal of Clinic, Culture, and Mental Sciences are licensed under the:
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0)
This means that authors retain copyright of their works and grant the journal the exclusive right of first publication, allowing third parties to share, distribute, and reuse the content provided that:
-
Proper authorship attribution is given, clearly citing the journal and the authors;
-
The use is strictly non-commercial;
-
Any adaptations or transformations also acknowledge the original source.
Commercial use of any content is strictly prohibited without prior written permission from the authors and the editorial board.
Recommended citation:
LAST NAME, First Name. Article title. Interapia – Journal of Clinic, Culture, and Mental Sciences, v. X, n. Y, pp. XX–XX, month/year.
Available at: [link to article].
Licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0.
